Evolved vs. Primitive Societies: The Moral Divide Between Freedom and Force

Throughout history, humanity has struggled with one central question: how should we live together? The answers have varied across cultures, ideologies, and time periods—but they all fall into two broad categories: voluntary societies based on freedom and coercive societies based on force. These two models reflect not just political choices, but levels of moral and intellectual evolution in the people who sustain them.

The Nature of an Evolved Individual

A morally and intellectually evolved individual has transcended the primitive instincts of domination, control, and obedience. Such a person:

• Understands the inherent dignity and sovereignty of every human being.

• Recognizes that aggression is never a legitimate tool for solving human problems.

• Chooses cooperation over coercion, dialogue over threats, and consent over force.

• Respects private property, voluntary contracts, and self-ownership as sacred.

• Does not require external rules imposed by a ruling class in order to behave ethically.

  
  

These evolved individuals form voluntary societies—communities based on mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and non-aggression. They do not need a state to tell them how to live, because they take personal responsibility for their actions and relationships.

Primitive Societies and the Worship of Authority

By contrast, individuals who have not yet evolved morally still depend on external authorities to regulate their behavior. These people believe:

• That peace must be enforced through laws, surveillance, and punishment.

• That without rulers, society would descend into chaos—an ironic belief, given that most war, corruption, and suffering throughout history have come from states.

• That it is acceptable—even necessary—to use threats, taxation, violence, and imprisonment to compel others to obey.

• That morality can be determined by legislation, rather than by principle.

Such individuals form state-based societies, which are primitive by nature. These societies rely on institutionalized aggression—police, prisons, military, and bureaucracy—to maintain order. Rather than cultivating internal discipline and mutual respect, they demand obedience and submission to a centralized authority.

Why Evolution Matters

This moral divide is not about intelligence or technology. A society may be technologically advanced while still being ethically backward. What truly defines the stage of societal evolution is how people relate to one another:

• Do they initiate force or respect boundaries?

• Do they threaten and punish, or persuade and cooperate?

• Do they view others as property of the state, or as sovereign equals?

In this sense, the difference between an evolved society and a primitive one is not just structural—it is spiritual. It reflects the inner development of the individuals who participate in it.

Signs of Evolved Societies

You will recognize morally evolved societies by the following characteristics:

• There are no rulers, only voluntary coordinators and private contracts.

• There are no forced taxes, only voluntary contributions and payment for services.

• There is no law enforcement by violence, only peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms.

• People are free to leave, disagree, and live as they choose, so long as they harm no one.

• 
  

In these societies, peace is not imposed from the top down—it emerges from the bottom up through mutual respect and natural order.

The Tragedy of Remaining Primitive

Remaining in a state-based society out of fear, convenience, or habit is akin to staying in chains when the door is already open. Those who support coercive systems, even passively, are contributing to the cycle of violence and oppression that has plagued humanity for centuries.

They may justify this with slogans like “for the greater good,” “for public safety,” or “because it’s the law,” but all of these are masks for aggression masquerading as virtue. No truly free or evolved society has ever been built on a foundation of force.

The Path Forward: Voluntaryism and Peaceful Coexistence

The way forward for humanity lies in voluntaryism—the philosophy that all human interaction should be voluntary and free from coercion. It is not a utopian dream; it is a natural result of maturity. Just as adults no longer need a parent to punish them into behaving, morally evolved humans no longer need a state to threaten them into cooperation.

Societies built on these principles are already emerging—quietly, independently, and peacefully. The Free City of Liberstad is one such example: a society based entirely on voluntary participation, private property, mutual respect, and natural law.

Conclusion: Choose Your Society—And Your Level of Evolution

Every person must make a choice. Do you live by force, or by freedom? Do you trust others only when they are controlled, or do you believe in their inherent capacity for peaceful cooperation? Do you support a system that imprisons, taxes, and dominates—or do you align yourself with one that respects life, liberty, and property?

Primitive people worship the state. Evolved individuals build free societies.

The future belongs to those who rise above coercion and choose peace over power, voluntaryism over violence, and freedom over fear.